Reports & evidence
A report that shows its working, not just its conclusions.
Every finding links back to the source that produced it — the registrar's reply, the bureau pull, the employer's written confirmation. The summary is plain English; the evidence behind it is one click away.
- 2views per report — executive summary and full evidence
- 3export formats — PDF, JSON, ATS sync
- 7 yrevidence retention, configurable
Case PT-24817 — Aarav Mehta, Area Credit Manager, Secured Lending.
A closed case, exactly as it leaves the platform. Four checks, one discrepancy of four months against the EPFO record, and every figure below is the figure the report carries. Toggle between the payload the checks returned and the brief a hiring manager reads.
Select Profile Type
Aarav Mehta
Area Credit Manager · Secured Lending
Executive Summary
Aarav Mehta is who he says he is. Identity, education and court records confirmed at source. One discrepancy found in employment history regarding exit dates, which the candidate has clarified with a relieving letter.
Verification Checks
Aadhaar XML & PAN matched · Face score 98.4%
Exit date discrepancy of 123 days found via EPFO.
University registrar roll verified.
4 jurisdictions searched · 7 years · clear.
Six parts of one page. Point at any of them.
This is the first page of PT-24817's signed PDF. Hover or select a block to see what that part of a Papertrail report is for, and what it holds in this specific case.
Report Structure
Executive Summary
A plain-English synthesis of the entire report.
Our AI engine synthesizes raw terminal outputs into a clear, bias-free narrative. It instantly tells you if a candidate is clear, or exactly what discrepancy was found, saving your HR team hours of reading.
Three artefacts, one case, identical evidence.
The same closed case leaves the platform three ways. Pick one to see what it actually looks like — the filed PDF, the JSON payload, and the record written back to your ATS.
Hover or focus a figure to see what sits behind it
Reports & evidence, answered
The executive summary's structure — which checks appear, in which order, with which level of detail — is configurable per package. The evidence and provenance layers are fixed because they are the audit record, not a presentation layer.
The signed report carries a content hash computed at the moment of signature. Re-downloading and re-hashing the file produces the same value if nothing has changed. Any modification — even a single byte — would produce a different hash and break the verification.
It is purged — documents, extractions, and provenance events are deleted on your configured schedule. The purge itself is logged as a terminal event on the case's audit trail, so there is a record that evidence existed and was retained for the agreed period.
That is your decision, not ours. The platform can generate a candidate-facing view that shows the same findings without internal annotations or adjudicator notes. Whether to share it, and when, is a policy choice you configure per package.
See a report on your own data
Run a case, read the report it produces.
The only way to evaluate a report format is to see one generated from a real case. We will set up a sandbox so your team can step through both views.